le centre de la bombe university

using Intermediaries to compose music like:

marking,
picturing,
writing,
computing,
techniquing,
are:

Digital MATTER
or how it is important for us to count our sensations

 

 

We are used to use writing -> to distinguish -> and to describe our musical intentions [1]

This means 4 things:

• 1st, we cannot conceive music without outside measured signs,

• 2d, we don't like to have our works forgotten,

• 3rd, our brain is handicapped. Without intermediaries we cannot communicate.

• 4th, we like external objects: toys.

 

The score is a souvenir of an assembling and processing of quantified musical sensations [2].
The music in this way seems to be a structural result of small quantities.
A digital thinking by counting our fingers (a digit is a finger).


But listening music is a feeling of qualities, a continuum, a continuity.
What can we do against this paradox?

NOTHING,


either we conceive music through intermediaries or we conceive music by playing music.
Writing-music has nothing to do with Playing-music

-> they are different musical activities

but complementary for a composer.

We do not know to conceive continuum tools to make music.
We do not know to make music without tools.

 

By writing music we are connected with the world of structured-mind-sensations,
and we keep distance and we are disconnected with sound-sensations.
By playing music free from educated technique we are an explorer in sound-sensations
also connected with the world of structured-mind-sensation:
____________________________________________________a lucky acrobat in warm mud...

 

 


NOTES:
[1] See the thought diagram: "
conceiving music philosophically."
[2] Pierre Barbaud has shown in his book "Musique, discipline scientifique" how to replace notes by numbers and compute them, like J.S. Bach who replaced notes by letters to sound words and names: especially his, and Mozart who wrote waltzes with the help of dices.